Legal Opinion
City of Annapolis v. Waterman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 7, 2000No. 37, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Appellant, the City of Annapolis (City), appeals from a decision of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, which principally involves the City’s subdivision approval process as it applies to the three-phase, twenty-year plus processing of a residential development proposed by appellees, Mareen D. Waterman and Marian Waterman. Appellees filed suit against the City alleging that certain conditions contained in the subdivision approval applicable to their property constituted an unconstitutional taking of that property. Appellees’ complaint alleged in relevant part:
15. ...…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People's Counsel v. SurinaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Serio v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- River Walk Apartments, LLC v. TwiggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Olde Severna Park Improvement Ass'n v. GunbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.