Legal Opinion
Bates v. Apfel
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided September 17, 1999No. C 97-3105-MWBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BENNETT, District Judge.
[[Image here]]
What is the significance of the claimant’s evidence of chronic pain syndrome in this application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act? The claimant contends that the administrative law judge overlooked the evidence that she is totally disabled by chronic pain syndrome, as did a magistrate judge in a report and recommendation that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security in this action for judicial review. The court finds…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Larry Grinder, Edward A. Loetel v. James A. Gammon Dora B. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Phyllis Y. BLACK, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Glenna R. WOOLF, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vo v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Alvarado v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Raiford v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023