Legal Opinion
State v. Ferris
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1995No. C8-95-1546PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
David Ferris argues the district court violated his right to counsel when it denied his request for court-appointed counsel during a probation revocation hearing without making a determination that he could obtain representation without substantial hardship. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Ferris was charged with gross misdemean- or driving under the influence pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. 1(a), 3(e)(1) (1994) and gross misdemeanor refusal to submit to testing pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. la, 3(c)(1) (1994). Ferris entered a negotiated guilty plea to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ronald Julian Hanson v. Rick Passer, Chief Executive Officer, Anoka County Adult Detention FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BalmaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. KoubaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. FerrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995