Legal Opinion · Dissent

Susanna M. Baginsky v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 10, 1983No. Appeal 519-78Published

1DissentKashiwa, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the prior order of the Court of Claims, 221 Ct.Cl. 908 (1979), contemplated a full review as to whether, prior to her discharge, Dr. Bagin*1077sky had been given the counseling the Manual required. The majority, however, determines this previously undecided issue on its own without a remand to the Claims Court. I would instead remand the case to the Claims Court for a determination of the counseling issue. I do not believe that it is proper or desirable for us to make our own initial fact findings on this issue without prior consideration by the Claims Court.

This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Whitney v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API