Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 24, 1985No. 84-2770PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI

delivered the opinion of the court:

Under the Illinois Pension Code, a police officer disabled while engaged in an “act of duty,” as defined in the statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 108 1/2, par. 5 — 113), is entitled to duty-disability benefits amounting to 75% of his salary at the time disability is allowed. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 108 1/2, par. 5 — 154.) A police officer disabled, while not engaged in an “act of duty,” receives ordinary disability benefits, which is 50% of his salary. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 108 1/2, par. 5 — 155.) The plaintiff, James A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. Retirement BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  2. Davis v. Retirement Board of the Policeman's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Fithian v. Retirement Board of The Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RETIREMENT BD. OF POLICEMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Olson v. City of Wheaton Police Pension BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Morgan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Sarkis v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Crouse v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API