Legal Opinion

Andrew Hall v. Lorettann and Nikolas Gascard

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided June 12, 2017No. 16-cv-418-SMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Andrew Hall, Plaintiff v. Case No. 16-cv-418-SM Opinion No.

2017 DNH 110

Lorettann Gascard and Nikolas Gascard, Defendants O R D E R Plaintiff, Andrew Hall is an art collector. He collects both post-war and contemporary art. Over a two-year period beginning in 2009, he purchased twenty-four works of art from the defendants, Lorettann Gascard and her son, Nikolas Gascard. Hall says he purchased some of those pieces directly from the Gascards, while others were purchased indirectly through auction houses to which the Gascards had consigned…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Margo Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API