Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Neff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1927No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

In this suit to recover certain deposits made by the vendee under a contract of sale of real estate, the verdict favored the plaintiff, but the court below made absolute a rule for judgment in favor of defendants n. o. v. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiff has appealed.

The material facts may be briefly Stated as follows: In April, 1920, defendant Neff agreed to sell a row of houses in the City of Philadelphia to plaintiff Watkins; the latter paid $7,500, in several installments, as earnest money on the contract, to be treated as liquidated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Fine v. SoiferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Lamb v. GreenhouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Lowry v. McMillanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  5. Piacentino v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wasserman v. SteinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Elkin's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Welch v. T. W. Warner Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. Durso v. FioriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Dunhour v. Factor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API