Legal Opinion
Xilinx, Inc. v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 2010No. 06-74246, 06-74269Published
1Opinion of the Court
598 F.3d 1191 (2010)
XILINX, INC., and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.
Xilinx, Inc., and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant.
Nos. 06-74246, 06-74269.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 12, 2008.
Filed March 22, 2010.
Gilbert S. Rothenberg, Richard Farber and Arthur T. Catterall (argued), Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent-appellant.
Ronald B. Schrotenboer, Kenneth B. Clark (argued)…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.