Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Raney

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1946No. 15633PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

When this ease was previously before this court (Yerbey v. Chandler, 194 Ga. 263), it was held that, under the will referred to in the defendant’s amendment to her answer, the devisees named in the will took a life estate only in the property devised. Under this ruling, which is the law of the case, Mary 0. Yerby, under whom the defendant claims title to the land, could convey no greater interest in the property than she possessed, which was a life estate; and under the contract set forth in the amendment, the defendant acquired no interest in the land existing beyond the date…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horton v. MurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Crider v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Yerbey v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Holton v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Terrell v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Head v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Odd Fellows v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Moseley v. MoseleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. Fessenden v. ParriginSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API