Barlow v. Shawnee Investment Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON the Merits of the Appeal.
With reference to the merits of the case on appeal, it should be said at the outset that “employer, appellant” strenuously contends that “the award against it was rendered without jurisdiction and without sufficient competent evidence to support it.”
We have not failed to keep in mind, not only in ruling on the legality of the appeal but also in deciding the case on the merits, that the employer in this case never elected to come under the provisions of the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law (Chap. 28, R. S. Mo. 1929). But such employer never filed written notice…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Wahlig v. Krenning-Schlapp Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Kemper v. GluckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.