Legal Opinion
Britschge v. Harmison
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 14, 1996No. 95-4186-SACPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dk. 27). Proceeding both informa pauper-is and pro se, the plaintiff Russell Britschge brings this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Britschge alleges the defendant Ed Harmison, while performing his duties as a part-time police officer for the City of Overbrook, committed an “act of police brutality” in violation of Britschge’s constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. (Dk. 1). Britschge alleges Harmison arrested, handcuffed, and placed Britschge…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. BarberDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Eberle v. City of NewtonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003