Legal Opinion

Neihart v. Universal Joint Auto Parts, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2005No. 30715PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

The appellant, Marie Neihart (Neihart), was involved in a work-related automobile accident while employed with Universal Joint Auto Parts, Inc. (Universal). The Industrial Commission ruled Neihart had failed to meet her burden of proving the accident caused the injury for which she was seeking benefits and, therefore, denied benefits. At issue in this appeal are whether there was substantial and competent evidence to support the Commission’s decision and whether Universal is entitled to its attorney fees on appeal.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 12, 2001, Neihart…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zapata v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Painter v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hughen v. Highland EstatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Boise Orthopedic Clinic v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Warden v. Idaho Timber Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Obenchain v. McAlvain Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Dallas Clark v. Shari's Management CorpIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bell v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Lattin v. Adams CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API