Holt v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Chief Judge.
We affirm appellant’s convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture and for three counts of exposing a child to a chemical substance or methamphetamine.
It is unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine. Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-403(c)(5)(A) (Supp.2007). It is likewise unlawful for any adult, with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, to knowingly cause or permit a child under eighteen years of age to be exposed to, ingest, inhale, or have any contact with a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cluck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Loy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008