Legal Opinion

Holt v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 31, 2008No. CACR 08-170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Chief Judge.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture and for three counts of exposing a child to a chemical substance or methamphetamine.

It is unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine. Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-403(c)(5)(A) (Supp.2007). It is likewise unlawful for any adult, with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, to knowingly cause or permit a child under eighteen years of age to be exposed to, ingest, inhale, or have any contact with a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cluck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Loy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API