Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between Ladin & D. & C. Textile Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1963Published

1Dissent

Breitel, J. (dissenting).

Respondent-respondent Textile Corporation, claiming breaches under and a violation of a five-year requirements contract, seeks damages both in an arbitration proceeding under the contract and in an action purportedly framed in tort. The breach of the contract and the basis for the tort involve the same events, the same wrong, and the same damages. Textile seeks to justify this multiple approach on the ground that the arbitration is against parties with whom it contracted, while the action is only against persons with whom it did not contract. It avoids an identity of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Leesona Corporation v. Cotwool Manufacturing Corporation, Judson Mills Division, Deering Milliken Research Corporation, and Whitin MacHine WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. Wellington v. ClaasonNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  4. In re the Arbitration between Harris & East India Trading Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Martine v. . LowensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API