Columbia Machine & Stopper Corp. v. Adriance Machine Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The defendant has appealed • from a final decree in this suit, the appeal from the interlocutory decree in which we decided twenty years ago (226 F. 455); the accounting has dragged through the incredible interval. The patent (Lawson, 1,095,-406) was for a machine for capping bottles, the capping tool of which was forced up and down by the revolution of an upright shaft which carried a “cam-ring.” A slot in the ring engaged a lug upon the capping tool which it reciprocated as it rotated with the shaft. The machine, by which after several efforts the defendant finally succeeded in evading the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Zenith-Detroit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Cincinnati Car Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Rockwood v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. U. S. Rubber Reclaiming WorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- James L. Taylor Mfg. Co. v. SteuernagelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Julius E. Foster v. American MacHine & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Swan Carburetor Co. v. Nash Motors Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950