Legal Opinion

Woodroffe v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 2013No. 10027899H; A146918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

Plaintiff, an inmate at Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI), petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that defendant has denied him constitutionally adequate medical treatment for his various physical and psychological conditions, including a fractured coccyx, knee pain, migraine headaches, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Or Const, Art I, § 16; US Const, Amend VIII.1 After the writ issued, defendant moved to dismiss, ORS 34.680(1), arguing, inter alia, that no objectively reasonable juror could find that defendant had denied plaintiff constitutionally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Herbert v. Altimeter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. Easley v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Zyst v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. Knope v. FhuereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. White v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API