Legal Opinion
Draughon v. Heitman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 19, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
In 1931 complainants in the court below were owners of a parcel of taxable real estate described in the bill as the Earnhardt building, which was assessed on the tax rolls of Lee County in the amount of $3510.00. That the property so assessed was income-producing property is a legitimate inference to be drawn from the description of it set forth in the pleading. Furthermore, that complainants did not pay, nor offer to pay, any taxes upon this real estate for the year 1931, or for any year since that time, is apparent also from the bill. Thus it was that as a direct result of complainants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- West Virginia Hotel Corp. v. W. C. Foster Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Dofnos Corp. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of Tampa v. Birdsong Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Oktibbeha County Bd. of Educ. v. Town of SturgisMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Mayor of Savannah v. FawcettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- American Can Co. v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.