Legal Opinion

LaMont v. Handy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of foreclosure. The defense is that usury was exacted in a written contract extending the time of payment. The mortgage was executed January 21, 1902, interest at five and one-half per cent with the principal due in ten years. Interest at five and one-half per cent was paid until January 21, 1925. At that time there was $1,352 of principal unpaid. In the previous December the usurious agreement was made by which seven per cent interest was exacted and the due date extended. Thereafter interest was computed and paid at a usurious rate. The trial court decided…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pryor v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. London v. ToneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Matter of Accounting of ConsalusNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Ganz v. . LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Bowery Savings Bank v. NirensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salter v. HaviviNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Eastern Shopping Centers, Inc. v. ControNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API