Legal Opinion
Hollis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 19, 2000No. 99-2209PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
763 So.2d 1155 (2000)
Gerald HOLLIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-2209.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
January 19, 2000.
Gerald Hollis, Chipley, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marrett W. Hanna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
KLEIN, J.
Appellant appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. He argues that his habitual offender sentence is illegal because the state failed to serve him or his attorney with written notice of intent to habitualize, prior to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Judge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hastings v. KrischerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Epps v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Acevedo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.