Love v. Love
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Maries Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. ' Hasell, Judge. (1) The instruction offered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence should have been given, because there was no substantial testimony offered which warranted the submission of the ease to the jury. Asker v. Sharper, 25 Mo. App. 1; Stokes v. Burns, 132 Mo. 214; Weaver v. Railroad, 60 Mo. App. 207; Pueschell v. Iron Works Co., 79 Mo. App. 464; Payne v. Williams, 63 Tenn.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Maries Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. ' Hasell, Judge. (1) The instruction offered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence should have been given, because there was no substantial testimony offered which warranted the submission of the ease to the jury. Asker v. Sharper, 25 Mo. App. 1; Stokes v. Burns, 132 Mo. 214; Weaver v. Railroad, 60 Mo. App. 207; Pueschell v. Iron Works Co., 79 Mo. App. 464; Payne v. Williams, 63 Tenn. (4 Bast.) 583; Pollock v. Pollock, 29 N. Y. 37; Young f. Young, 8 Wash. 81, 35 Pac. 592; Tucker v. Tucker, 74 Miss. 93, 19 So. 955; Rice v. Rice, 104 Mich. 371,…
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, J.
This is a suit by the plaintiff against the defendants for alienating the affections and ^depriving her of .the assistance and society of her husband, John Rainey Love.
The facts'disclosed were, that on the 13th day of April, 1900, the plaintiff and said John Rainey Love were married in the county of Maries, Missouri, and that they cohabited as husband and wife for a short time, when he abandoned the plaintiff and left the State. The evidence tended to- show that the marriage was compulsory upon the husband. At the time of the marriage the plaintiff was about seventeen and the husband about…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Bennett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Hartpence v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Morgan v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Beck v. DowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Barton v. BartonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Leavell v. LeavellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Leavell v. LeavellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Fronk v. FronkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.