Legal Opinion

Fronk v. Fronk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Harrison Circuit Court. — Hon. G. W. Wanamaker, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This action was begun in tbe cir-. cnit court of Worth county, September 1, 1909, to recover actual and punitive damages for tbe alienation of tbe affections of plaintiff’s husband. Tbe defendants are tbe father and step-mother of tbe bus-band, Harry Fronk, and tbe petition alleged that they *544“wrongfully, wickedly and maliciously acted and cooperated together with the wrongful, wicked and malicious intent to cause plaintiff’s said husband to leave and abandon her . . . and on or about the-day of January, 1909, the defendants, pursuant to their said wicked, wrongful and malicious intent did…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Bennett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Reed v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. White v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Reed v. Peck, Guitar & WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Nicholson v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Monen v. MonenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API