Legal Opinion

Frykman v. University of Minnesota-Duluth

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 2000No. C6-99-1733PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant University of Minnesota-Duluth, claiming that it owed no duty to respondent Kristen Frykman, who slipped and fell on its premises, objects to the trial court’s denial of its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the jury’s earlier verdict. Because the trial court properly upheld the jury’s determination that appellant’s duty arose before respondent was injured, we affirm.

FACTS

On February 10, 1996, respondent slipped and fell on ice as she exited a building on the UMD campus between 11:00 and 11:30 a.m. She suffered serious injuries, including a broken ankle.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Mattson v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Pouliot v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Rettman v. City of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Hedglin v. Church of St. Paul of Sauk CentreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API