Legal Opinion

DOE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00259Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEFINA DOE et al., ) Plaintiffs, VS. Civil Action No. 3:24-259 ) Judge Stephanie L. Haines U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ) HOMELAND SECURITY, ef al., ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs bring this civil rights action arguing that a policy and practice of Moshannon Valley Detention Center (““MVDC”), which disallows detainees access to New Jersey state court proceedings via video-conferencing technology or telephone, is unlawful and a violation of the detainees’ constitutional rights. Pending before the Court is a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API