DOE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEFINA DOE et al., ) Plaintiffs, VS. Civil Action No. 3:24-259 ) Judge Stephanie L. Haines U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ) HOMELAND SECURITY, ef al., ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs bring this civil rights action arguing that a policy and practice of Moshannon Valley Detention Center (““MVDC”), which disallows detainees access to New Jersey state court proceedings via video-conferencing technology or telephone, is unlawful and a violation of the detainees’ constitutional rights. Pending before the Court is a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.