Legal Opinion
Broekelschen v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 10, 2010No. 2009-5132PublishedCited by 519 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.
Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Peter Broekelschen, M.D., appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims affirming a special master’s decision denying Dr. Broekelschen’s petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (“Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (2006). The special master concluded that Dr. Broekelschen did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the flu vaccine caused his injury. See Broekelschen v. Sec’y of Health & Human…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Debra Ann Knudsen, by Her Parents and Legal Guardians, Doris P. Knudsen and Dale Knudsen v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by519 opinions
- Broekelschen v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Porter v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- W.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Hibbard v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
514 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.