Legal Opinion
Geaneas v. Willets
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 15, 1989No. 83-344-CIV-ORL-19PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FAWSETT, District Judge.
This case was presented to the Court sitting as jury for trial on February 22, 23 and 28, 1989. 1 In its previous Order dated January 12, 1988, this Court determined that Daytona Beach Ordinance 81-334, codified as City of Daytona Beach Code Section 5-25, is not unconstitutional on its face. As to the contention of vagueness, however, the Court at that time focused primarily on the provisions of the Ordinance dealing with exposure of the female breast, as the parties had stated that they were not then in contention concerning the provision of the Ordinance…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geaneas v. WilletsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- 2025 Emery Highway, LLC v. Bibb County, GeorgiaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
- Geaneas v. WilletsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Dodger's Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Johnson County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Dodger's Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Johnson County Board Of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.