Legal Opinion

Norwood v. Allen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 1966No. 5-3741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant instituted a partition suit seeking to enforce her alleged interest in certain lands by reason of her father’s will. The appellees, the Allens, resisted the partition suit as the owners in fee simple title deraigned from a 1935 court approved sale, specifically pleading the statute of limitation. The chancellor granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment and held that appellant had no interest in the lands and that appellees are the sol© owners.

On appeal appellant contends for reversal that (1) her father’s will contained no provision authorizing the sale of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Epps v. RemmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Brake v. SidesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Cannon v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. EiseleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Parkman v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API