Legal Opinion

People v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2014No. S202483PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Statutory law allows a city to install at an intersection an automated traffic enforcement device that photographs a traffic law offender, who is then issued a citation, as was defendant, who went through a red light in Culver City and was later convicted of violating the red light traffic law (Veh. Code, § 21453, subd. (a); all further undesignated statutory references are to the Vehicle Code). Operation of such a device must be preceded by a public announcement and an initial 30-day period during which warnings are given instead of citations. (§ 21455.5, subd. (b);…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. BanksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. Luckey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API