Mansur v. Josephson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
Notwithstanding the earnest argument of appellant’s attorney, we are of opinion, after a careful reading of the record, that the court below did not abuse its discretion, in refusing to grant a new trial to his client, who was mulcted in damages by the jury’s verdict, which found him guilty of negligence in operating his automobile.
Four motor vehicles were concerned in the machine melée which figures in this case, and the difficulty is in picking out, with certainty, the driver or drivers at fault. It is contended appellant was not to blame at all, and, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cirquitella v. C. C. Callaghan, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- O'Farrell v. MawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Canon v. Penna. Trust Co., Admr. C. T. A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Keller Et Ux. v. Keystone Furniture Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Thomas v. Waters Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Yago v. PipicelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- MacNeill v. MakosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Kozemchak v. GarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.