Legal Opinion
City of Harrisonville v. Public Water Supply District No. 9
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 2004No. WD 62443PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.
In 1998, the City of Harrisonville (“City”) annexed some territory within the boundaries of Public Water Supply District No. 9 (‘Water District”) in Cass County. Both the City and the Water District wished to serve the land in question with water. The City brought an action in 2001 to detach the land from the boundaries of the Water District so that the City could provide water service to the area. The City’s action was brought pursuant to section 247.165, RSMo 2000. The Water District contended the statute was not applicable because the annexation in question did…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Burkard v. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. TobermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Armco Steel v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Cross v. Drury Inns, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Public Water Supply District No. 8 Of Clay County, Missouri v. City Of Kearney, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Public Water Supply District No. 8 of Clay County v. City of KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- In the matter of the petition of Missouri-American Water Company for approval to change its infrastructure system replacement surcharge (ISRS), Missouri Public Service Commission v. Office of Public CounselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016