Legal Opinion

City of Bedford v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 2001No. Record 001927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

I

The primary issue that we consider in this appeal is whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

II

The plaintiff, Guy Duvall Zimmerman, filed a motion for judgment against the City of Bedford, which operates an electric power department. He alleged that he was injured as a result of the City’s failure to turn off electrical power to a temporary power meter base. The City admitted that it was negligent, but asserted that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

At a jury trial, the circuit court denied the City’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Tri-State Coach Corp. v. WalshSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Artrip v. E.E. Berry Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Pugsley v. PrivetteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. Watson, Adm'x v. Virginia Elec., Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Exchange v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Towler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  3. Molina v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  4. Tashman v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. City of Richmond v. HoltSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API