Legal Opinion

Bendock v. Traton Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 2000No. A00A0334PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Scott and Tina Bendock appeal pro se from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Traton Corporation. The Bendocks refused to close on the house Traton built for them and sued Traton for the return of their earnest money and other damages. Because we conclude there is an issue of fact as to whether Traton unjustifiably breached its contract with the Bendocks, we reverse.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). To obtain summary judgment, a defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Supchak v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Bailey v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Cotton v. Bank SouthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Consolidated Federal Corp. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aliabadi v. McCar Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Arkwright v. TaulbeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API