Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1934No. 25457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

The respondent, Bert 0. Harvey, was in the employ of petitioner, Oklahoma Pipe Line Company, on August 8, 1929, and on that date sustained an accidenta] personal injury in the course of his employment. He was furnished hospital and medical attention, and was also paid compensation for temporary total disability for the period of his disability. Respondent returned to work on September 7, 1929, and remained in tbe emploj' of the petitioner for 30 days when he was discharged. Thereafter, on May 3, 1932, said respondent filed with the State Industrial Commission a motion to reopen the cause.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blackstock Oil Co. v. MurtishawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Fournier Stucco & Plastering Co. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Lemaster v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API