Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1976No. 75-331PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STOUDER

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Stanton Blaylock, commenced this action in the circuit court of Tazewell County seeking damages from the defendant, Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad Company, under the terms of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. §51 et seq.). Pursuant to the railroad’s motion for summary judgment the trial court entered judgment in the defendant’s favor and plaintiff has appealed.

In its response to the complaint, the railroad included in its answer an affirmative defense in which it alleged the plaintiff’s claim had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Ruggles v. SelbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Welsh v. CentaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. McCormick v. McCormickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. In Re Marriage of WilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Janowiak v. TiesiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Lopez v. Winchell's Donut HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API