Legal Opinion

Charleston Milling & Produce Co. v. Craighead

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1935No. 8042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, President:

This is an action by a notice of motion for judgment upon a promissory note signed by defendants, H. B. Craighead and Ocie Craighead, his wife, and payable to the order of plaintiff, Charleston Milling & Produce Company, in the sum of $1,354.48.

At the time of signing the note, and to secure the payment thereof, the makers conveyed to Harvey G. Davis, trustee, a stock of merchandise and fixtures of a retail mercantile business conducted in the name of Rhodell Feed Store at Rhodell, Raleigh County, West Virginia. As further security for the payment of tbe note, H. B. Craighead…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tidewater Quarry Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  2. Duke v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Bulkeley v. WelchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  4. Eversole v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
  5. Commercial Investment Trust v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emery's Motor Coach Lines, Inc. v. Mellon Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of PittsburghWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Scottsdale Discount Corporation v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API