Legal Opinion
Patterson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1910No. 1,810PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. Charles A. Patterson was convicted of perjury, and.he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was charged by indictment in the court below with the crime of perjury, assigned upon an oath takén by him before a notary public in support of an application for a patent for a one-piece harness buckle.
The statute relating to such patents contains these, among other, provisions: ' .
“Sec. 4886. (Rev. St.) Any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country, and not patented or described in any printed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. KeitelSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. BiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William C. Siravo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913