Legal Opinion

In re Daimler Trucks N. Am. LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 2018No. 04-18-00039-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

...... [Under Texas law] [t]o establish economic feasibility, the plaintiff must ... introduce proof of the cost of incorporating this technology.

So all these cases, Judge, go to what we're required to prove to carry the day and what we're trying to prove.

Now, Judge, two of the components, the RSC and the ECS, they were available as optional features on the truck Mr. Garza was driving, so to demonstrate economic feasibility, we need to show the costs and sales price of those *840components and the costs and sales price of the truck that Mr. Garza was driving, as well as the costs and sales price…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Union Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Guzman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. In Re Xto Resources I, LpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Acuna v. Covenant Transport, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
  2. In Re University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, RelatorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
  3. in Re 4X Industrial, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
  4. in Re Robert L. Marshal, II, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API