Legal Opinion

In Re Union Pacific Railroad

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2009No. 08-0740PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we consider whether a trial court abused its discretion when it compelled a rail transportation company to produce confidential “rate structures,” which include formulas to determine shipping rates charged to customers. We hold that it did, as the defendant met its burden of establishing that the information sought is protected by the trade secret privilege and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate how the information is “necessary or essential to the fair adjudication of the case.” In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 106 S.W.3d 730, 732 (Tex.2003). We, therefore, conditionally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Continental General Tire, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Daniels Health Sciences, L.L.C. v. Vascular Health Sciences, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Globeranger Corp. v. Software AG United States of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. Tewari De-Ox Systems, Inc. v. Mountain States/Rosen, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. in Re PrairieSmarts LLC and Casey Rockwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  5. In re CauleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API