Linky v. Midwest Midrange Systems, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Brian Linky raises one issue in this interlocutory appeal of right under Indiana Appellate Rule 14(A)(8): whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying his Motion to Transfer for Incorrect Venue. Specifically, Linky argues that Marion County, the venue in which appellee-plaintiff Midwest Midrange Systems, Inc. ("Midwest"), brought this case, is not a preferred venue. Thus, he claims that the cause should be transferred to Kosciusko County, which is a preferred venue. Finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pratt v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Parkison v. TLC Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Humphrey v. ChristopherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of South Bend, Department of Public Works v. D&J Gravel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Shook, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc. v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Randolph County v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- City of Carmel through its Redevelopment Commission v. Crider & Crider, Inc., and Hagerman Construction CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Randolph County v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007