Legal Opinion

Linky v. Midwest Midrange Systems, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 2003No. 49A02-0305-CV-373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Brian Linky raises one issue in this interlocutory appeal of right under Indiana Appellate Rule 14(A)(8): whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying his Motion to Transfer for Incorrect Venue. Specifically, Linky argues that Marion County, the venue in which appellee-plaintiff Midwest Midrange Systems, Inc. ("Midwest"), brought this case, is not a preferred venue. Thus, he claims that the cause should be transferred to Kosciusko County, which is a preferred venue. Finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

FACTS

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Pratt v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Parkison v. TLC Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Humphrey v. ChristopherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. City of South Bend, Department of Public Works v. D&J Gravel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Shook, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc. v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Randolph County v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. City of Carmel through its Redevelopment Commission v. Crider & Crider, Inc., and Hagerman Construction CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Randolph County v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API