Pratt v. Pierce

OPINION

RILEY, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Gary Pratt (Pratt) files an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Transfer for Improper Venue pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 75.

We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.

ISSUES

Pratt raises two issues for review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying his Motion to Transfer for Improper Venue.

2. Whether the trial court erred when it denied his request for travel expenses and attorney fees under T.R. 75(C).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On…