Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. DeGidio

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2013No. 2012-1697PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Anthony James DeGidio Jr. of Toledo, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0069064, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1998. In June 2012, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged DeGidio with commingling personal and client funds in his client trust account, using that account to pay personal expenses, and failing to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation.

{¶ 2} Although DeGidio received relator’s complaint by certified mail, he did not answer it. Consequently, relator moved for default. A master commissioner appointed by the Board of Commissioners on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API