Legal Opinion

Dodin v. . Dodin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1900PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the first judicial department after the entry of an order of the Appellate Division in the second department, made April 13, 1897, affirming an interlocutory judgment determining that the defendants were the only heirs at law of Mansuy P. Dodin, deceased, and as such are seized in fee in equal shares as tenants in common of the real property described in the complaint, subject to the plaintiff’s right of dower…

Read the full summary

Appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the first judicial department after the entry of an order of the Appellate Division in the second department, made April 13, 1897, affirming an interlocutory judgment determining that the defendants were the only heirs at law of Mansuy P. Dodin, deceased, and as such are seized in fee in equal shares as tenants in common of the real property described in the complaint, subject to the plaintiff’s right of dower therein, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Martin and Werner, JJ. Dissent: Bartlett and Vann, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of UpjohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. United States Trust Co. v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Holt v. County of TiogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. In re the Estate of MarshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. Central Trust Co. v. SkillinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API