Arthur v. Cole
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case -is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. The exceptions are omitted, as they are not necessary to the understanding of the questions passed upon.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This case turns upon the construction and effect of the deed of the 29th of October, 1868. By that deed William H. Cole, in consideration o.f one' dime, and natural love and affection, conveyed a small leasehold property in the City of Baltimore, to his two sisters, Martha and Elizabeth, “ to have and to hold the same unto the said Martha and Elizabeth, as tenants in common, so long as they both shall live, and from and after the death of either of them, then unto the survivor so long as she shall live, and no longer, or so long as they both shall remain unmarried, and from and after the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Appleby v. Estates of ApplebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Bennett v. Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's HomesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Bostick v. BladesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Jones v. MagruderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. HoulehanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.