Wilmington Trust Co. v. Houlehan
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
Three points of view are presented by the contending defendants. They are:(a) That the seventy-five per cent, of the estate should be immediately paid over to the widow and the guardian of the daughter absolutely and in equal shares. This is the view of the solicitor for the widow and daughter.(b) That the seventy-five per cent, should be held as a trust fund upon the following trusts: to pay over the net income to the widow and daughter during the widowhood of the widow and the lifetime of the daughter; in case the widow never remarries, to pay the net income to her and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vanderzee v. SlingerlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Benson v. . CorbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Fowler v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Parsons v. WinslowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of GoldmarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
- Maloney v. JohnsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
- Wilmington Trust Co v. GrierCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Bradford v. CulbrethSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Foote v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.