Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 8, 1962Published

1Opinion

On Petition to Rehear

Appellees have filed a petition to rehear on a number of grounds; all of which we find without merit:.

*357(1) The Court is not required to strike assignments of error on the ground they fail to comply with the rules but may,-in the interest of justice, notice'errors not formally assigned. Nance v. Winebarger, 32 Tenn.App. 229, 222 S.W.(2d) 231, 234, and cases cited; Rule 11 Court of Appeals.(2) We reiterate our finding that there was no evidence that the jury in the original suit knew of the existence of the mortgage and that Holland and wife and their counsel were well aware…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Nance, Inc. v. WinebargerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. Erwin v. DavenportTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API