Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Davenport

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROM FRANKLIN. Appeal in error from the judgment of the Circuit Court, March Term, 1868. N. A. Patterson, J.

1Opinion of the Court

J. W. Burton, Sp. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

H. L. Erwin, as administrator of Thomas O. Cul-ver, deceased, for the use of his widow and children,, sues D. E. Davenport for $10,000 damages, for running a train of cars over and killing the said Culver.

It is averred in the declaration that D. E. Davenport was appointed receiver of the Winchester and Alabama Railroad, in pursuance of the law on that subject, and while possessing, managing, and controlling the said road, and while engaged in running and *46causing to be run an engine and train of cars on and over said road, by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seymour & Bouck v. Van SlyckNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elmore v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API