Legal Opinion

Moynahan v. Prentiss

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1897No. 1245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Rl Raso County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

The peculiar tenure by which Prentiss held title to an interest in a certificate of stock of the Phil Sheridan Mining & Milling Company, and the opportunity which Moynahan had to make a little money by the sale of it gave rise to this suit. *296The judgment which was entered may he an equitable adjustment of the controversy, but it is sustained by neither the pleadings nor the proof.

On the 1st of January, 1894, Owen Prentiss and J. P. Dunleavy were doing business as lawyers in Cripple Creek. They did business together, but whether the terms and conditions of their connection and the agreement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Halstead v. ShepardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Blaker v. SandsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Smith v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Lindsey v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Page v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Beaman v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Jeffries v. PankowOregon Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API