Legal Opinion
Nutt v. Ellerbe
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided March 9, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed his bill for an injunction against the defendants to prevent them from enforcing acts of the state of South Carolina which will be hereinafter cited, on the ground that those statutes are in conflict with the Constitution of the United States. A temporary restraining order was granted pending the hearing upon the application for an interlocutory injunction by three judges pursuant to section 266 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 380). The application has been heard before three judges, and the question of the issuance of the interlocutory…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. LivingstonDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1959
- Glass v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Mullaney, Commissioner of Taxation Territory of Alaska v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Royalty Service Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- General Mills, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.