State v. Lovell

Timothy Lovell received probation after jurors found him guilty of interfering with arrest.1 His preserved claim on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, on which our review

is limited to whether the State has introduced sufficient evidence for any reasonable juror to have been convinced of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When judging the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, appellate courts do not weigh the evidence but accept as true all evidence tending to prove guilt together with all reasonable inferences that support the verdict and ignore…