Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Appellant and a codefendant, Floyd Bailey, were each charged with two counts of rape, sodomy and unlawful imprisonment of a 14-year-old female. Originally, codefendant Bailey and another man, Darryl Schermerhorn, were arrested in connection with the crimes. Bailey confessed, implicating himself and appellant Russell, at which point Schermerhorn was released and Russell was arrested.

A joint jury trial was held and Bailey’s redacted confession, which referred to himself and "another person”, was introduced…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. ComfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. CuestaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API