Legal Opinion

State v. Khater

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 1, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTHENBERG, J.S.C.

This municipal appeal comes before this court pursuant to R. 3:23. The defendant appeals his conviction under Paterson Municipal Ordinance RGOP § 4-2, which requires the licensure of all mechanical amusement devices (except for those listed in RGOP § 4-1.1) used in public, quasi-public or private club settings. The limited issue on appeal is whether the municipal ordinance that the defendant allegedly violated, RGOP § 4-1, is a valid and reasonable exercise of the City of Paterson’s police power in order *67to protect and regulate the health, safety, and welfare of its…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Summer v. Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. Overlook Terrace Management Corp. v. Rent Control Board of West New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. State v. CrawleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. MacK Paramus Co. v. Mayor and CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API